The Employee Engagement Network

Agnes Goh

Are Managers and Leaders of the Organisation the Key Influencer for increasing employee engagement and how can we improve post-survey change efforts?

I read the article that Paul Mastrangelo shared in another discussion thread on "Will Engagement Be Hijacked or Reengineered" and found it to be very real and practical.

Paul mentioned that the Manager Focused model is flawed as a post survey action. I agree, coz my HR/OD has been focusing on this approach for the past few years and there has been no transformational change. Paul mentioned that we should be designing our change efforts to address what is frustrating employees and preventing them from being engaged.

I have heard some say that leaders/managers are key to employee engagement. Get that right, everything else will fall into place. But what if the business problem was the leadership or the manager (lack of direction, not walking the talk, busy manager issue, etc)?

Leaders and Managers most certainly would not like to hear that the problem lies with them. What kind of post survey change efforts can be done to address this if we don't take a Manager Focused model?

Tags: action, leadership, post, survey

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Most often managers and leaders wish to inspire higher engagement - from and for themselves, and from and for their people. After all, higher engagement is a good thing across almost all psychological, social and commercial dimensions.

However, they also often lack the tools, ideas, and support required to do this, and so need a helping supportive hand in order to get started.

For ideas and inspiration here see www.engagingideas.co.uk

Thank you Agnes, or as we say in Portugal, Ines.

Reply to This

Agnes,

The thing that jumps to mind for me is whole-system change interventions, most notably integrating Appreciative Inquiry processes such as summits and dialogues. This has worked at thousands of organizations of all stripes. The AI commons is a good place to see case-studies and get a handle on what AI is all about: http://appreciativeinquiry.case.edu/

Typically, we encourage clients to embrace both approaches- leader focused and whole-system. They tend to feed each other and keep the momentum going.
Help for organizations committed to cultural transformation:
http://www.leadershipbeyondlimits.com

Reply to This

Agnes - Great questions. Two ideas from my experiences: 1) Use a survey that measures more than just engagement. At one company I know they used a survey that measured both engagement of employees and behavior of managers, and then correlated that with revenue, safety, and other results based on sales, manufacturing, etc. This allowed us to be very specific with leaders about how their behavior could drive engagement and results for their sales office, plant, etc. 2) The other thing is that managers can learn more from their peers than from their leaders or from us in HR. At another company, they built a story-board on the intranet where managers could share the actions they took, at their level and in the day-to-day operations, as a result of their own survey results. Hope these ideas are fodder for your success!

Reply to This

Thanks for sharing your experiences. Great ideas. I was thinking the same as your 2nd suggestion. Putting the various managers best practices/ action plans on the intranet to share with the organisation. Increasingly, my strategy is to stop talking about how to improve engagement or what needs to be done, but instead to just keep talking about the success stories, the positives. When people see success, others will want to do something and follow as well.

Reply to This

Hi Agnes --

Two quick thoughts:

- leaders/managers are part of the solution but so are peers. For years Delta ran a recognition program where 80% of the recognition awards were peer-to-peer (and no money value attached.) Managers can't be omnipresent, seeing everything an employee does well, but collectively one's peers can, and Delta employees made sure to single each out for doing the right things. The net effect was the same: employees feeling that their actions mattered and made a difference for the company.

- in general, leaders and managers aren't taught a "right" way to praise an employee, it's assumed people just know how to do it, leading to situations like this one described by Lucy Kellaway of FT where badly constructed praise can do more harm than good. One of the obstacles to manager adoption is the absence of a good model of how to do it -- but that's something easily rectified with a combination of communications and examples.

Scott

Reply to This

RSS

Latest Activity

Michael Lee Stallard added a blog post
Do you ever wonder how past leaders could have missed what seems so obvious in hindsight? Sadly, most leaders live in an environment that makes them vulnerable to managerial failure. The problem lies in a little-recognized reality of leadership: iso…
2 hours ago
6 hours ago
Aravind Gangadharan, Brush Read, Margaret Cernigoj and 2 more joined The Employee Engagement Network
6 hours ago
Terrence Seamon "Galvanize into action" is my new free e-guide for job hunters, available via the Box.net app on my LinkedIn profile
8 hours ago
10 hours ago
Dear Ray, Your concern is well founded. Employees look forward to surveys like they do a visit to the dentist! The Horsepower Survey, however, is an employee-focused survey to measure how rewarded employees feel about their work. It consists of sev…
10 hours ago
10 hours ago
10 hours ago
10 hours ago
Mike, I will make mention of this new group in the next newsletter. Thank you for starting this and I wish you well and all European members the best with this focus. David
11 hours ago
Jason: Good points about trust and aligning the strategic engagement with employee engagement. We need results for all. I am concerned you will lose readers due to lack of formatting on this post. I encourage you to ensure that you format your pos…
11 hours ago
Thanks for sharing this information, Roy. When I was Research Director at The Loyalty Institute, we found that the #1 driver of employee commitment was an organization's efforts to build a sense of spirit and pride. This was true in the US as well…
11 hours ago
As a survey consultant I guess that I should like the idea of conducting monthly surveys, but I am concerned that employees may feel that they are being "over surveyed." There are options, of course. An organization might randomly assign each emplo…
11 hours ago
Kelly Lefebvre, Rob Robson, Chris Hewitt and 1 more were featured
12 hours ago
This is a great read, a great story. I smiled the whole time as I read this. If this conversation is possible in your organization, then I'd say your leadership is trusted and transparent. Thanks for this story.
12 hours ago
Paul M. Mastrangelo added a blog post
I won't be wishing you "Season's Greetings" or "Happy Holidays" this December. These secular, generic salutations are popular in corporate America because they are not specific to any one religion or belief system. The business world, like America's…
13 hours ago
David Zinger Mentally engaged with the Great Wall of Saskatchewan as a metaphor for work legacy. http://bit.ly/77lwav
14 hours ago
Hello Paul: "if you want to improve productivity and reduce costs, you need to tap into human nature’s pleasure-fueled engine." I could not agree more but if we wait until after we hire someone we have waited too long. Bob
14 hours ago
A Manager shall know one's team member more than his/her mother knows him/her. Offered by Shweta Mohanty Posted by David Zinger
14 hours ago
Mike Klein Thinking about intersection of sustainability, employee involvement and political activity-things will be more interesting post-Copenhagen
14 hours ago

Groups

Engage Today. Join the growing employee engagement network.

© 2009   Created by David Zinger on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service