The Employee Engagement Network

With so much focus on the factors that engage employees..What are the factors that provide engagement for a leader?

What role does an employee have in engaging their leader or manager
What role does a team have in engaging a leader or manager
What role do senior managers have in creating a culture that engages leaders?

Marc Michaelson
Partner
The Glowan Consulting Group
www. glowan.com

Share Twitter

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Good questions, Marc.

Since leaders are people, the factors which cause them to be engaged are the same as for the troops. Fully meeting their most basic needs of being heard and being respected in every possible way will cause them to develop a strong sense of ownership and thus be engaged 100%. The less these needs are met, the lower their level of engagement.

Best regards, Ben
http://www.bensimonton.com/articles.html

Reply to This

Ben, thanks for this...I agree with your premise totally. Cascading engagement throughout and organization requires consistency in the culture. What I am interested in looking at more closely is how a leaders direct reports might take more responsibility for engaging their leader or manager --a more proactive personal practice

Marc

Reply to This

Thanks for the comment, Marc.

I specifically did not comment on how a leader's direct reports might take more responsibility for engaging their leader. I consider that to be an exercise in futility and one that can only have negative consequences for the junior.

Taking responsibility for something over which you have absolutely no control is a very big error. The Serenity Prayer makes clear how one should act in such matters. The best any junior can hope for is that by performing magnificently, the junior can set an example the boss might try to emulate. But take responsibility? No way. In 30+ years of managing people, I have witnessed many juniors who tried to change their boss. The results were never good, often quite disastrous for the junior.

Best regards, Ben

Reply to This

Ben & Marc

I've never met a manager who cannot be manipulated impacted. Sorry, couldn't resist.

The Serenity Prayer is appropriate possibly for some, but I'd rather lean on circles of influence. We can all impact others around us, the degree of impact being determined mostly by proximity, credibility of the impacter, and willingness of the leader to listen to others. The latter is a key element in the definition of leadership.

Above all, to have a shot at enhancing a leader's engagement, there must be a relationship. Also, I need a good grasp of my leader's drivers / motivators. Not just business priorities-that's only part of the equation. What really makes Mr / Ms Kahuna tick?

The more I know about my leader, the more I can tweak my approach. Knowledge is most definitely power.

I guess that does sound rather manipulative, after all. This is an extremely interesting question, Marc-deserves insightful conversation!

Craig
In Pursuit of Excellence

Reply to This

Craig, thanks for you thoughtful response! Collaborative leadership between a leader/manager and their team requires a two way street of engagement to cultivate what I refer to as Collaborative Advantage. With knowledge workers in particular, a sense of shared leadership is required to capture their interest and engagement...with that said, some effort on their part to engage their leader will in the end create a good partnership...

Marc

Reply to This

Marc,

I agree that it requires a two way street, as you say. However, the manager is the one who controls whether or not the street even exists and the extent to which it exists. The manager controls this by the way he/she treats subordinates and the extent to which he/she meets the needs of subordinates. The most basic of these are the need to be heard and the need to be respected. Listening carefully and responding respectfully to what subordinates say they need to do a better job is the most important action a boss can take, but there are others.

My point is that it all starts with the boss and what the boss does, not what the junior does.

Best regards, Ben

Reply to This

Ben, agreed...in most cases the boss does "control" the street...and in more collaborative, knowledge worker environments some of this is changing. The "boss" (if they are smart) facilitates more that dictates, and team members have the opportunity to "influence" the leadership culture in ways that bring about decision making, innovation and change that is "owned" by everyone...which is a high form of engagement

Marc

Reply to This

RSS

Latest Activity

45 seconds ago
5 members updated their profile photos
19 minutes ago
Jon Weedon is now a member of The Employee Engagement Network
22 minutes ago
Saurabh Gahrotra Does complete talent fitment lead to absolute performance???
33 minutes ago
40 minutes ago
A manager should always remember he/she is "on stage"- and his/her subordinates notice every little trait so always exhibit the behavior you would want them to emulate.
42 minutes ago
As a Leader it is your job to facilitate progress, be the agent of change not the barrier to it.
1 hour ago
Jim Taggart added a blog post
From Jim's Blog: Changing Winds I love Leo Babauta’s Zen Habits, in which he writes on simple productivity and life issues. His recent book The Power of Less is a compact and practical guide to reclaiming your life from busyness and inefficiency. I…
1 hour ago
Hi Ben... Thanks for the reply! Question--what have you seen as a "clear, coherent script" that assures success? And do you think such scripts need updating to address the shifts we've seen in organizations and the marketplace? All the best from…
1 hour ago
In my experience, achieving engagement creates huge increases in productivity per person, morale, retention, profits, sales, and every other "devoutly to be wished" result. So it is always worth the effort. But the company person, CEO or executive…
1 hour ago
1 hour ago
Latest EE news is now posted for Friday.
1 hour ago
Do two things: trust your employees unconditionally and give them more responsibility than they would ever expect; they will rise to the occasion and surpass all expectations.
1 hour ago
2 hours ago
Mike Klein--The Intersection added a discussion
In the wake of "The Great Recession" and in appreciation of the changes in the economy and in the nature of employee-employer relationships, the idea of “employee engagement” (“Engagement”) presents an intriguing dilemma. While some say a focus on…
2 hours ago
Interesting question. I'm drawn to less is more, and even that may be too much :) My experience has shown me that the more fearful the organisation is, the more often it seeks to measure as a means to try and stave off the fear. It then often ends u…
3 hours ago
I would contend never is too soon. If you understand what engagement is and how to achieve it, then you know what an engaged employee sounds like and acts like as compared to one who is somewhat engaged or disengaged. Surveys turn people off while…
4 hours ago
Look beyond generic engagement tools: focus on personal drivers from employees, group them accordingly and align engagement tools.
5 hours ago
The real challenge to engage employees is to gain trust by giving them autonomy to shape their own jobs to their own wishes, interests and strengths but always aligned with an open and transparant organisational vision and strategy.
5 hours ago
Before you start engaging an employee, know him and respect him as an individual first and engagement will follow.
8 hours ago

Groups

Engage Today. Join the growing employee engagement network.

© 2010   Created by David Zinger on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service